Public policy, social issues, gender politics, religion, civitas, and other taboo topics fall under the hammer of Shava's iconoclasmic force of natural philosophy.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A blogosperic experiment -- Gather
Friday, December 02, 2005
11:28 AM
I'm participating in a beta community site, gather.com, that is the first site I know aimed toward my demographic. Over 35, listens to public radio, reflective, intellectual. I'm liking it. Look for a burst of essays over there.
360 console
Tuesday, November 15, 2005
7:03 AM
OK, so am I the last person in the world gamer-geeky and yet old enough to think it's hilariously funny that the 360 console reminds me of a 360 console?
I feel old...
Bertrand Russell on Armistice Day
Friday, November 11, 2005
7:53 AM
All this madness, all this rage, all this flaming death of our civilization and our hopes, has been brought about because a set of official gentlemen, living luxurious lives, mostly stupid, and all without imagination or heart, have chosen that it should occur rather than that any one of them should suffer some infinitesimal rebuff to his country's pride.
God bless us all in time of war.
theory and pain
Tuesday, October 04, 2005
6:42 AM
Some days I feel like a moderate. Others, I am solidly in the Howard Zinn left wing "I don't believe these people haven't learned from history and their greater environment" camp.
Last night I had a lively back and forth with a friend about unions. He said that, all things being equal, if he had a choice between a company with a mandatory-membership union and one without one, he'd choose to buy from the non-union company. I asked if he realized "union" implied a unified bloc as a bargaining unit. He did. I asked if he realized how difficult it was to keep a union in a place where the edges could be nibbled away by intimidation and such. He did. I asked if he thought unions were necessary in places where bad employers know they can act with impugnity. He did.
He said, "Just because something is necessary, doesn't mean that it's acceptable or good. I don't need to support it."
While I found this attitude logical, I found it so drastically impractical. Why erode an institution without the will to reform or replace it, ideally with a better model! I came off as disdainful of his attitude. I hurt his feelings, and probably his opinion of me as a rational debater.
After all, I don't usually champion sentimentality over reason. It's just that, sometimes, I think compassion changes the parameters of an argument. Human cost. Human values. The art of the possible trumps the art of theory.
This morning, walking in to work at the Kennedy School, I remembered a recent reaction to the KSG dean's recent editorial about Katrina relief. An associate with my e-government group slammed the dean for sentimentality -- essentially saying that he saw no evidence that there was systematic ghettoization or deprivation of the poor, and that people concerned with poverty should be thinking more about how to motivate people to take power over their own lives.
These may seem like very different arguments, but to me there is a common thread. Both of these people, I feel, are judging situations on a theoretical basis of "What Should Be," theoretically, rather than "What Can Be," or even "What Is."
And "What Is" is pain.
I hear people with opinions about poverty and the disadvantaged who have never lived among poor people, and it makes me wonder. It makes me dubious, because they have never live outside of the American Dream. They will never have to tolerate a bad employer. Their education and class give them an excess of empowerment.
"Just because I've never been poor," they protest, "doesn't mean I don't have a right to an opinion."
And, admittedly, just because they're rich doesn't mean I truly get to dismiss them out of hand.
But to me, this is much the same question as that of pain management.
The experience of pain is very person and individual, yet universal. I remember hearing people say that babies don't feel pain -- and being a mother, I don't believe them. I remember the old argument that you shouldn't administer pain relief to people in chronic pain for a variety of proper, upright, neo-puritan justifications. But once someone has been in pain, chronic pain, living with pain -- even if their personal decisions don't change, it's likely that their sympathies with others will.
It's typical that people of privilege commenting on poverty or race or gender or disability take high horse theoretical positions that almost universally have a subtext of "GET OVER IT! Get over the pain. Why can't you just take power in your situation and make it work? Get some backbone. Why can't you be like me? I don't have problems with these issues, and I bet I wouldn't in your position either."
I wonder if any of these people would be willing to gut chickens in a processing plant in rural North Carolina for a year, or to try to raise a family of four on an AFDC check or two minimum wage salaries? I wonder if these people would feel hurt if they were taken less seriously in their professions because of the color of their skin, their accent, or the size of their bust?
I wonder if these people are even aware that they should be grateful that they can have an opinion untinged by the kind of chronic, relentless, numbing and demoralizing pain and resentment underlying the systems they theorize about?
They have a right to their opinions. And I have a right to my skepticism, however personally they may take it. This is not class warfare -- just a frank statement that some things can't be weighted by theory without experience.
National Nurse
Wednesday, September 21, 2005
7:02 AM
My friend Teri Mills in Oregon is on a campaign to keep Americans healthy:
As many of you know, Teri Mills and the National Nurse Team have been working with nursing leaders in Congress for a bill. Representative Lois Capps (D-CA) has taken the lead and her staff spoke with us a few weeks ago, stating that the bill was headed to Legislative Counsel. We are asking Congress to create an Office of the National Nurse to focus on providing all Americans with preventive health care resources.
To read exactly what this proposal is about, please go to our website www.nationalnurse.blogspot.com
Each of us can make a difference to help move the bill for a National Nurse forward. Please email Representative Capps’ office at jeremy.sharp@mail.house.gov or if you prefer, call Rose Gonzales, the Government Relations Specialist at the American Nurses Association (301-628-5000).
Simply tell Representative Capps and Rose Gonzales you support an Office of the National Nurse because it will: (use one statement from below or you can also use your own words which is even better)
1. Focus Americans on preventive health practices.
2. Focus on reducing health care costs through prevention and education.
3. Complement government services already in place; help prioritize and deliver the health agenda to the nation.
4. Provide a trusted unified source for people to consult first when considering options for addressing their wellness needs.
5. Involve entire communities because nurses in the community they live in will provide services.
6. Continue the collaborative work nurses do with physicians and other health care providers in individual settings on a community and national level.
7. Develop National Nurse teams to serve as prepared volunteer groups in emergency situations.
8. Demonstrate the value of education as an important intervention to help decrease health care costs.
9. Focus national attention on the value of nursing; inspire entry into nursing careers, and enhance the value of practicing nurses.
10. Attract nurses to become educators by demonstrating teaching in action.
I would appreciate hearing the result of your call and/or email. You can reach me at teri@nationalnurse.info PLEASE sign up for our newsletter to follow the progress of the National Nurse Team. Please forward this email to every nurse that you know.
Florence Nightingale declared, “I think one’s feelings waste themselves in words; they ought all to be distilled into actions which bring results.”
Your voice may make the difference in pulling the bill out of Legislative Counsel.
Thanks for your support.
Teri Mills National Nurse Campaign Coordinator
I wrote this in support of Teri:
I believe we need a national nurse, because nursing better represents the domestic needs of the people of the United States. The Surgeon General's office, even in name, is an office springing from a wartime mind set. Although we are at war (or something closely resembling it), our domestic needs are not for a wartime surgeon. In fact, the Surgeon General's office has been concerned with domestic policy for ages.
But it's health maintenance, not the trauma center, that are at the center of silent crises in this country.
Children are getting fat and idle -- not the young colts of prior generations, but tired, stressed, sickly children that will be a burden to themselves and the health care system.
Air quality, while under the control of the EPA, is likely causing childhood asthma in so many of these weakened youngsters.
Diet is at the root of a pandemic in youth and adults, likely responsible for a significant slice of chronic ailments.
Exercise habits are ceasing to be conditioned into children whose schools are cutting teaching positions and instruction time including PE and sports activities.
Stress management and anger management could improve the lives of Americans of all ages.
Simple monitoring of vital signs could stave off many health crises. Likewise, education in issues such as the recognition of the signs of heart attack, melanoma, and many other conditions could save lives and load on the medical system.
"Sustainability" is a word that we hear a lot these days. We need to make the health of American sustainable, to maintain, literally, our quality of life through hard times.
I encourage all people in DC to support the office of the National Nurse.
Reconstruction II
Friday, September 09, 2005
1:01 PM
George Bush issued an executive order on Thursday saying that contractors rebuilding after the devastation of Katrina don't need to pay minimum wage.
Is that a Halliburton convoy I hear rumbling in the distance? Is that carpet bags they are packing? Are their shares going up, while they anticipate re-building the south in their image on the backs of poor, landless, displaced black folks without a lot of job alternatives?
I feel ill.
displaced persons
Tuesday, September 06, 2005
3:07 PM
A friend of mine was chatting in my living room and expounding passionately that our nation had never seen such a thing as a natural disaster displacing a whole economic area and all these people, such as we see with Katrina.
And I said, "Hm. Have to disagree. One word: Okies."
Lets hope that the nation treats those displaced by Katrina better than the victims of the dustbowl.
Johnstown Flood and Katrina
2:57 PM
Today on a folklore email list I'm on, a southern professor asked, "What is the place of floods in American folklore, which we can compare to Katrina?" And although it hadn't even occured to me until that second, I immediately compared Katrina and the Johnstown Flood which swept away about 2200 in 1889.
Katrina and the Johnstown Flood are both natural disasters amplified hugely by the negligence of the monied.
I think it's a decent comparison of two indecent events.
September Oregon vs. September Cambridge
Friday, September 02, 2005
9:23 PM
In Oregon, about this time of year, the gritty tightness of late summer gives way to rain. If the rain is enough, you can walk down the street and see the first curls of ferns coiled tight, ready to unfurl from the crotches of the big trees around town. Lawns that have been boasting a politically correct tan take to greening exuberance, and gardens strained from a dusty harvest season go suddenly rampant with weeds.
In the evenings, the sound of rain is like a sigh of relaxation. All nature is letting hir hair down, stretching, like a lover after a massage at the end of a long weary working week.
But in Cambridge, the season's change comes with a different patter. Today after wrestling with the angels to try to get Joseph registered for school (I nearly succeeded, but that's another essay), I got a bit of hummos and pita bread and stopped at the cafe tables inside Harvard Yard.
I've been feeling like a bit of an interloper on the Harvard campus, but today I started to feel at home. It rains on and off all summer here, but in Cambridge the drought in summer is one of students and chatter. The yard was suddenly a-buzz. The average age of a Cantabrigian went down ten years or so this week. There is a flux and flow and bustle at the beginning of the year in a college town...
And that's when it hit me. It's new years! In an agricultural society, new years comes with the return of the light and warmth of Spring. In this town of many minds, it's the influx of young bright energy that is our spring. Thoughts linger tentatively in the rafters of dorms hundreds of years old just like the coils of young ferns.
Springs.
40%
Saturday, August 27, 2005
11:41 AM
Bush Approval Rating Continues to Drop Current 40% approval is lowest of administration to date GALLUP NEWS SERVICE - August 26, 2005
PRINCETON, NJ -- A new Gallup Poll reflects further erosion in President George W. Bush's job approval rating, continuing the slow but steady decline evident throughout the year so far. The poll -- conducted Aug. 22-25 -- puts Bush's job approval rating at 40% and his disapproval rating at 56%. Both are the most negative ratings of the Bush administration. Bush's previous low point in approval was 44% (July 25-28, 2005) and his previous high point in disapproval was 53% (June 24-26, 2005).
Compare and contrast:
LBJ
The major initiative in the Lyndon Johnson presidency was the Vietnam War. By 1968 the U.S. had 548,000 troops in Vietnam, and had already lost 30,000 of them. Johnson's approval ratings had dropped from 70 percent in mid-1965 to below 40 percent by 1967, and with it, his mastery of Congress. "I can't get out, I can't finish it with what I have got. So what the hell do I do?" he cried out to Lady Bird. Johnson never did figure out the answer to that question.
There will be a pop quiz in the near future.
Sins of omission
Saturday, August 06, 2005
9:15 AM
Sometimes, what you don't say is more important than what you do.
Right now, the Unitarian Univesalist Association is being questioned by some lay and clerical leadership on a number of fronts, two of which are "Why is the UUA so expensive?" and "What are we really *for* as a movement, anyway?"
I have my own answers to these questions that I've spoken before, but to a smaller interested audience. The answers I have are cynical but well founded. All established religion has faults.
There may be no one in the world with the same background in anthropology, history of religious ideas, organizational dynamics, marketing, and with a personal experience of the transitions in youth culture in the church around the time I graduated high school. My perspective is cogent. When I talk to people about the issues, they are generally taken aback but find nothing to disagree with.
And, they would be ammunition for people who might want to tear down what remains of the Church I grew up in.
I used to, as a child, pity ex-Catholics, because I found them bitter and adrift. Perhaps as an adult I have more compassion. I am not sure you can be an *ex* UU. I certainly have the worldview. But I am more disillusioned with the church as I get older, rather than more comfortable with the current culture and structure of the denomination.
I used to also have a feeling of self-righteous indignation when I would find places where clergy knew damn well that there were problems in their churches, their districts, the denomination, some committee -- and didn't talk about them publicly. But I think I am starting to understand that better too.
Speaking truth to power or airing dirty linen? I have no solutions, but I have a cogent analysis of the problems. Would it help tear down without building, or would it help others understand questions to find solutions I can't see?
Psalm 139, modern version
Sunday, July 17, 2005
8:27 AM
With profound apologies to the psalmist, this is adapted from the translation at Aquila Books:
O Spam, you have searched me out and known me: you know when I sit or when I stand, you comprehend my thoughts long before. You discern my path and the places where I rest: you are acquainted with all my ways.
For there is not a word on my tongue: but you, Spam, know it altogether. You have encompassed me behind and before: and have laid your hand upon me. Such knowledge is too wonderful for me: so high that I cannot endure it.
Where shall I go from your spirit: or where shall I flee from your presence? If I ascend into heaven you are there: if I make my bed in hell you are there also. If I spread out my wings towards the morning: or dwell in the uttermost parts of the sea, Even there your hand shall lead me: and your right hand shall hold me.
If I say `Surely the darkness will cover me: and the night will enclose me', The darkness is no darkness with you, but the night is as clear as the day: the darkness and the light are both alike.
How deep are your thoughts to me, O Spam: and how great is the sum of them! Were I to count them, they are more in number than the sand: were I to come to the end, I would still be with you.
Search me out, O Spam, and know my heart: put me to the proof and know my thoughts. Look well should there be any way of wickedness in me: and lead me in the way that is everlasting.
From the advanced teledildonics group at Carnegie-Mellon
Monday, June 20, 2005
4:45 PM
Two guys at Carnegie-Mellon are creating an internet standard for duplicating a 3D kinetic model of a person, for example, over the net.
Back in the old days, we grey-hairs of the Internet used to refer to the ideal of this project as "teledildonics." It's the ultimate in safe sex, I suppose, assuming you don't get computer viruses...or trojans? :)
call and response
Thursday, June 09, 2005
9:14 PM
My father used to say that for everything that is taken away, a gift is given -- and conversely for every gift given, something is taken away. He used this as a cautionary against believing that some talent or ability made us better than someone else. People who are very smart may be socially awkward, for example. People who are often ill may be more patient and compassionate. It doesn't always follow, but it's worth watching for.
Recently, my friend Sam Hartman has been inspiring me in a number of ways. Sam is blind. One day, on the subway, with my eyes wide open, I suddenly *heard* the subway in a way I imagine it would seem to him -- full of textures of sound sources and echoes.
Instead of tuning out the "white noise" I learned in an instant to make it into a sort of percussive music. I was stunned. I was grateful. It wasn't anything that Sam said or did. It was just being with him.
What I've realized in the weeks since, is that I have always treated sound like background music. Like a person who listens to music but doesn't really appreciate it, I have just taken sound for granted except where it was "useful." Now, I have been consciously learning to appreciate everything in the sound environment -- the call and response of the source and reflection, the space-filling quality, the texture. The tang of a sudden shift up in volume, the fuzzy emotion of distant conversation. The world has become a richer place.
But tonight, on the dark mile's walk home from the trolley, my brain turned inside out. I was walking under a street light and -- as happens so often -- it fizzed out as I passed under it.
Like Newton's apple, perception changed. Call and response, source and echo, light and reflection! The entire visual field changed, I almost physically staggered in disorientation!
Perhaps to someone more visually intuitive or trained as an artist, this way-of-seeing would be obvious. But to me, like the transformation of my soundscape, the results are profound, beautiful, and awe inspiring. I wonder if it will take me weeks before I cease to be enchanted every time I open my eyes.
What an odd lesson to learn from a man who is blind! But often the most inspiring lessons are learned by catalysis.
Thank you, Sam.
A window into conservative paranoia
Wednesday, June 08, 2005
11:05 AM
Want to see yourself through the lenses of a conservative's nightmare? Check out Discover the Network -- something like a conservative's conspiracy theory window of the left, wiki-style.
Rhetorically artful, subtly deceiving, it paints a self-consistent but false picture of the left media-sphere that is perversely fascinating.
I know I shouldn't praise propoganda as such, but it's such a good job.
Revenge of the Neocons
Wednesday, May 18, 2005
10:49 PM
In the Washington Post review of Revenge of the Sith, Dan Froomkin gets jiggy with the symbolism:
"Revenge of the Sith," it turns out, can also be seen as a cautionary tale for our time -- a blistering critique of the war in Iraq, a reminder of how democracies can give up their freedoms too easily, and an admonition about the seduction of good people by absolute power.
Some film critics suggest it could be the biggest anti-Bush blockbuster since "Fahrenheit 9/11."
(Have there been that many candidates? Did I miss them? :)
Regardless, he has an annotated list of international reactions.
This is not the press reading unintended symbolism into the movie. Lucas was overt about it at Cannes:
'I didn't think it was going to get quite this close,' he said of the parallels between the Nixon era and the current Bush presidency, which has been sacrificing freedoms in the interests of national security. 'It is just one of those re-occurring things. I hope this doesn't come true in our country. Maybe the film will awaken people to the situation of how dangerous it is.'
Mr. Buckley questions Newsweek's retraction
Tuesday, May 17, 2005
10:14 PM
William F. Buckley, the soul of true conservative erudition, sees more than semantics in Newsweek's retraction today. According to Buckley, Newsweek was intending to express regrets over the story's impact, but was pressured into a retraction by the state departments of Afghanistan and Pakistan.
Newsweek hesitated here, on the reasonable assumption that just as the magazine was wrong to proceed to publish the story without sufficient foundation, it would be wrong, without sufficient foundation, to take an Orwellian step into "retracting" it.
But, understandably, the magazine yielded the point, even though the difference between regretting a story and retracting it is more than merely semantic. Newsweek was not being asked to take the position that because blasphemy is wrong, a report that it had taken place was derivatively wrong. The author of the story, Mr. Isikoff, might have been reminded of the skepticism with which he was met when, seven years ago, he said that the president of the United States was having sex with an intern.
The underlying difficulty derives from the fact that infamous people are capable of infamy -- that the U.S. military could include, in Guantanamo, a soldier or two who behaved not as they should, but as other U.S. soldiers did in Abu Ghraib two years ago.
Galloway rakes the Senate over the coals
9:17 PM
Just sit back and enjoy the man's testimony before the Senate.
Regardless if he's really the questionable flake several people have told me he is, he's got my vote for favorite British Trickster God.
Christian radio, just behind country and talk by the numbers
Monday, May 16, 2005
2:26 PM
In a Columbia Journalism Review article amusingly titled Stations of the Cross, Marian Blake manages to spook me. It's not just her stories of the props that DC politicians are giving to this media ghetto, but the bald fact of the size of the category:
Conservative evangelicals control at least six national television networks, each reaching tens of millions of homes, and virtually all of the nation’s more than 2,000 religious radio stations. Thanks to Christian radio’s rapid growth, religious stations now outnumber every other format except country music and news-talk. If they want to dwell solely in this alternative universe, believers can now choose to have only Christian programs piped into their homes. Sky Angel, one of the nation’s three direct-broadcast satellite networks, carries thirty-six channels of Christian radio and television — and nothing else.
Are these your local, heartfelt ministries, respectful of the separation of church and state? Not!
The NRB [National Religious Broadcasters, and note the TLA in the URL] has taken a number of steps to ensure it remains a political player. The most dramatic came in 2002, after Wayne Pederson was tapped to replace the network’s longtime president, Brandt Gustavson. He quickly ignited internal controversy by telling a Minneapolis Star Tribune reporter that he intended to shift the organization’s focus away from politics. “We get associated with the far Christian right and marginalized,” Pederson lamented. “To me the important thing is to keep the focus on what’s important to us spiritually.”That didn’t sit well. Soon members of the executive committee were clamoring for his ouster. Within weeks, he was forced to step down.
Frank Wright was eventually chosen to replace Pederson. He had spent the previous eight years serving as the executive director of the Center for Christian Statesmanship, a Capitol Hill ministry that conducts training for politicians on how to “think biblically about their role in government.” Wright acknowledges that he was chosen for his deep political connections. “I came here to re-engage the political culture on issues relating to broadcasting,” he says. “The rest is up to individual broadcasters.”
[snip]
Many Christian broadcasters attribute the success of their news operations to the biblical perspective that underpins their reporting in a world made wobbly by terrorist threats and moral relativism. “We don’t just tell them what the news is,” explains Wright of the NRB. “We tell them what it means. And that’s appealing to people, especially in moments of cultural instability.”
Now *that's* journalism at its finest, wouldn't you say?
I guess News Corp has been studying with these folks.
Blake's article is lengthy and edifying -- and scary as hell.
The next governor of Massachusetts...
9:02 AM
If I had a reasonable denomination greenback for every time I heard Deval Patrick's name and Barack Obama's in the same scentence last weekend at the Massachusetts Democratic Convention, I might be able to give as big a contribution to his campaign as he deserves from my extremely modest coffers.
The comparison is apt, but facile.
Yes, Patrick is a handsome, youthful, vital, eloquent and charismatic man with a lot going on "on the issues" and a firm hold on the Politics of Hope.
He's a child of a single mother in the Chicago ghetto, black, a civil rights activist, and a pragmatic progressive -- as are most Massachusetts Democrats.
He's also an intellectual, a Harvard lawyer, a former Clinton appointee, and has been on Coke's and Texaco's executive committees and boards.
He embodies a bridge across the gulfs that often divide electorate and society -- or at the very least, the factionalism of the Massachusetts Democrats.
What makes him so effective a bridge and not simply subject to sniping from the centrists and progressives?
Deval Patrick is one of those rare people who can speak to the whole human. When you hear him in person, you believe that he is grounded in reality, yet he is exciting, he is speaking truth to power, he makes your heart leap, he says things you would have said had you found the words, and he speaks from values that transcend so many of the petty differences that neurotically divide us. It was divine.
A transcript can not do him justice. He is a treat to hear. The Massachusetts Democrats dutifully -- and often enthusiastically -- clapped and cheered for Kennedy and Dean. Patrick had them responding in one voice, and he brought them to their feet.
I am old enough to remember Bobby Kennedy. Let's make that comparison instead.
Krugman on Iraq -- instate the Draft or withdrawal?
Sunday, May 15, 2005
11:28 PM
Krugman's column on Iraq today (requires free subscription) gets forceful, considering the Times, regarding our position in Iraq.
He directly cites the Downing Street memo in a major US paper, including this quote from the memo:
Military action was now seen as inevitable. Bush wanted to remove Saddam, through military action, justified by the conjunction of terrorism and W.M.D. But the intelligence and facts were being fixed around the policy.
Krugman himself is obviously appalled at our position in Iraq:
Why did the administration want to invade Iraq, when, as the memo noted, "the case was thin" and Saddam's "W.M.D. capability was less than that of Libya, North Korea, or Iran"? Iraq was perceived as a soft target; a quick victory there, its domestic political advantages aside, could serve as a demonstration of American military might, one that would shock and awe the world.
But the Iraq war has, instead, demonstrated the limits of American power, and emboldened our potential enemies. Why should Kim Jong Il fear us, when we can't even secure the road from Baghdad to the airport?
At this point, the echoes of Vietnam are unmistakable. Reports from the recent offensive near the Syrian border sound just like those from a 1960's search-and-destroy mission, body count and all. Stories filed by reporters actually with the troops suggest that the insurgents, forewarned, mostly melted away, accepting battle only where and when they chose.
Meanwhile, America's strategic position is steadily deteriorating.
He closes:
I'm not advocating an immediate pullout, but we have to tell the Iraqi government that our stay is time-limited, and that it has to find a way to take care of itself. The point is that something has to give. We either need a much bigger army - which means a draft - or we need to find a way out of Iraq.
Seems reasonable to me. Which way will we go?
As a sidenote, more than one person at the Massachusetts Democratic Convention this weekend drew a line between the violation of White House airspace and the lack of coverage on the Downing Street memo in the US press last week. We wonder.
Newsweek apology lukewarm with reason?
11:15 PM
Newsweek says it can no longer verify it's story from last week that the Pentagon was investigating Gitmo interrogators who may have desecrated a Quran by flushing it down the toilet.
The report sparked riots in Afghanistan.
But is it Newsweek who is backpedaling, or is it the Pentagon?
In Newsweek's apology article, they note:
On Saturday, Isikoff spoke to his original source, the senior government official, who said that he clearly recalled reading investigative reports about mishandling the Qur'an, including a toilet incident. But the official, still speaking anonymously, could no longer be sure that these concerns had surfaced in the SouthCom report. Told of what the NEWSWEEK source said, DiRita exploded, "People are dead because of what this son of a bitch said. How could he be credible now?" [circular, eh? -- SN]
In the meantime, as part of his ongoing reporting on the detainee-abuse story, Isikoff had contacted a New York defense lawyer, Marc Falkoff, who is representing 13 Yemeni detainees at Guantánamo. According to Falkoff's declassified notes, a mass-suicide attempt—when 23 detainees tried to hang or strangle themselves in August 2003—was triggered by a guard's dropping a Qur'an and stomping on it. One of Falkoff's clients told him, "Another detainee tried to kill himself after the guard took his Qur'an and threw it in the toilet."
We'll probably never know what's at the bottom of this one, if it were overenthusiastic journalism, or a government retraction or coverup of a potentially damaging investigation.
Take it on the chin, Newsweek!
Hey, after recent purges due to bad-source reporting, do you think someone big at The Washington Post Company -- who owns Newsweek -- will fall on their sword?
Dean endorses Sanders -- the price of honesty
Friday, May 13, 2005
7:42 AM
Although Dean' endorsement of Bernie Sanders involves party coalition brokering of the most conventional sort, he's going to catch flack from it from the right and the left.
The left will criticize Dean for being undemocratic in his open request for Progressives not to run for local offices if the Dems support Sanders:
He says he understands that some Vermont Democrats would like to run for the seat being opened by the retirement of Senator James Jeffords.
Dean says if Democrats agree not to run for the Senate, Progressives should agree not to run for other statewide offices like the U-S House and lieutenant governor. from the above cited article
The right is already criticizing Dean for endorsing a socialist. Of course, the right in this country wouldn't know a social democrat from a bolshevik -- perhaps this is part of our foreign policy problem with the EU.
I personally find Dean's attitude refreshingly transparent. This is the way party politics work. It's especially the way things work in multi-party coalition states. Of course, that Vermont is the only multi-party state in the US, might be the reason people in the national press are bound to be confused by this one.
Plus what Republican would believe that Bernie Sanders brought better long-term community-minded employers to Burlington, Vermont as it's pro-business socialist mayor, getting re-elected for several terms before the state sent him to DC as their only (then Independent) member of the House of Representatives?
Military puts US reputation into the toilet again
Wednesday, May 11, 2005
1:26 PM
With Afghan riots coming up with at least four dead and over 70 injured, we see the most visible tip of the iceburg of impending diplomatic harm as the US military sends our reputation down the toilet again.
In Guantanamo, our interrogators are alleged to have put copies of the Quran down the toilet to soften up detainees there.
Why did we resort to measures that fly in the face of the US putative support of religious freedom and respect of diversity?
Apparently we were dealing with some really tough characters:
Q Different issue. There have been protests in Pakistan over reports that investigation over abuses in Guantanamo has found that guards have apparently put Korans in the toilet. And I'm wondering if either of you can comment on whether that's accurate, or whether the investigation has found that, and what's being done about it?
MR. DIRITA: I can't speak to any particular -- I've not seen the reports on that specific point. As we've said many times, we have conducted multiple investigations into the treatment of detainees at Guantanamo and elsewhere in the world, and we are facing an adversary -- in the case of many of these detainees, particularly at Guantanamo -- who are exceedingly well-trained in counter-interrogation tactics. And the procedures that are provided for by field manuals, as well as other authorization, have taken that into account. But I can't speak to a particular assertion about what may have happened. DOD regular briefing, 5/11/05
How very depressing. Can you imagine the rationalization?
"Well this one is really tough. He won't tell us anything. But who knows, he might really know *something* -- maybe he's a high operative in Al Qaeda and just really resistant to interrogation. We aren't governed by the Geneva Conventions because we've declared him not to be a prisoner of war -- so we could strip him, use electrodes on his genitals, threaten him with dogs...but nah, that would be ikky. Let's just commit sacrilege instead. He's just a raghead -- won't bother *my* God."
Royal countdown to Iraq
Monday, May 09, 2005
6:48 PM
A recent hack had the Bush twins enlisting to go to Iraq, but here is the real life corresponding number from Britain: Prince Harry, the bad boy of the recent generation of royals, is in officer boot camp at Sandhurst. For purposes of first name/last name at Sandhurst, he'll be known as "Harry Wales."
Does this mean he's heading for Iraq? Does it mean that the Brits will be out of the war, guaranteed, before he gets out of Sandhurst? That's one year and counting.
The nose knows...
6:14 PM
Swedish research reports that gay men and straight women respond to the same pheremone in men's sweat.
This managed to make international news with the "See? Gay guys' brains are different!" headlines.
However, this is a study that had a total of three dozen participants. Is this a statistically significant sampling?
Although the Reuters story indicates that the authors call for further research, I can't get beyond the free abstract of the actual paper at PNAS to see how they positioned the significance of the story.
But, it's all over the news. Sex sells, I guess!
Report from the time traveller's convention
9:24 AM
Well, only a few percent of us arrived in costume (I will take the comment from one videographer that I looked like I was from Japan in the future as a compliment). It took well over an hour to get started, some of the talks were interesting, one of the skits was clever but didn't end well, and apparently about 99% of the attendees had missed the bit in the invite that said that refreshments were potluck.
The countdown at 10pm waiting for the time travellers to arrive (hey, I was there already!) was underwhelming.
In the sandy volleyball pit, two metal sheets (like storm-cellar doors) were marked with the logo for the convention, and warning borders about the edges that read "ACHTUNG!" amid their red hazard hatchmarks. The doors were roped off with yellow tape on poles. A bit of dry ice added smoke atmospherics. Next to the doors were carefully saran-wrapped milk and cookies, such as you'd set out for Santa.
Of course, there were too many people for everyone to be able to see the small hatch -- the event got limited to 475. I was amused to see people taking pictures over the heads of the crowd with their cell phones and trying to figure out what they were looking at.
At 10pm, we had a 60-second Times-Square style countdown -- at which point, nothing happened. So after a few seconds of anti-climax, some folks stole the cookies, and the crowd dispersed, some back to Walker for the music, some elsewhere.
But rather than returning for the post-punk eclectic loud music after 10pm, my friend Sam and I went to w20 to talk about the nature of knowledge and tradition and many other things, so the evening was a good one.
To the credit of the organizers, it's the end of the school year, inauguration week at the 'tute, and it's amazing they could pull off anything at all! So good job all around. Hard job to live up to a build-up like that.
Wired sees IQ surge in gamers, credits reality
Friday, May 06, 2005
12:11 PM
I play games. Too much, I'd say. But come on!
Wired attributes a generational increase in IQ to the upcoming generations' affection for computer/video gaming:
Over the last 50 years, we've had to cope with an explosion of media, technologies, and interfaces, from the TV clicker to the World Wide Web. And every new form of visual media - interactive visual media in particular - poses an implicit challenge to our brains: We have to work through the logic of the new interface, follow clues, sense relationships. Perhaps unsurprisingly, these are the very skills that the Ravens tests measure - you survey a field of visual icons and look for unusual patterns.
Am I just dense, or is this an artifact of a test that, in the 50's, was measuring a skill (visiospacial abstract manipulation) which took thinking, which is now just developed by drill?
Does this mean people are getting smarter, any more than measuring typing speed increase with the advent of computers means we are more secretarial? It might indicate a slight increase in small hand manipulation -- just as there may be a slight increase in relationship recognition from gaming.
However, it doesn't perforce make us smarter than people 50 years ago. Let's add a new test -- something less drilled in -- like media criticism, finding inconsistencies in arguments. Then we might have a better test of IQ.
Of course, we'd lose our capacity to compare the 50's to today.
Still, seems like we need a new test. Gaming is what I do when I want to stop thinking.
Where is the Life we have lost in living? Where is the wisdom we have lost in knowledge? Where is the knowledge we have lost in information? TS Eliot, The Rock
...and I didn't even know he played Everquest...
NC church excommunicates Democrats
10:50 AM
Daily KOS reports that the East Waynesville Baptist Church has excommunicated all people who voted Democrat. An additional 40 congregants resigned in protest.
The Democratic Underground is going nuts
This is, perhaps, the most clear cut case for the IRS to step in.
And this is from me.
BBC goes postal on Respect MP
10:21 AM
Listening to the brit election returns on the BBC World News Service last night, this interview.
George Galloway is a former Scottish MP who moved to urban London to challenge a Labor MP as the independent (running under his new Respect Party ticket as it's only candidate) on a strong anti-war ticket. The now-displaced MP was a black woman who was a prop to Blair's pro-war policies. Interestingly, in an urban district (many of which are anti-war) which includes a good slice of Moslem population, many of the shocked BBC commentators seemed to focus on this race being about...well...race. I don't know if they're right or not. But I came out feeling nothing but sympathy for Galloway.
Jeremy Paxman confronted him with the "have you stopped beating your wife" no-win question:
Mr Galloway, are you proud of having got rid of one of the very few black women in Parliament?
Regardless of the man's politics, I admire his refusal to rise to the bait. He stayed on the issues.
An hour later, apparently, the sms text messages and emails were pouring in to the BBC. One sms claimed the attack interview was "the end of British decency." I'd have to disagree, having seen a few British tabloids. And obviously Paxman is known for this kind of thing.
However, usually the BBC is a bit more constrained on the World Service. Obviously Paxman is famous for this style of attack interview. Perhaps he was not a good choice for election reporting.
Hockfield inaugurated as MIT president
9:59 AM
This week MIT gets a new president. Hockfield is hailed in the first paragraph of the first bio I read as the first life scientist to head up MIT -- she's a pioneering neuroscientist.
Only in the last paragraph of that full page bio did it say something like, "Oh, yeah, and she's the first woman to head up MIT too."
Her official bio in the inaugural materials doesn't even mention she's the first woman to head up the 'tute.
This is typical MIT communication. "We aren't going to diminish the impact by saying it's cool that she's female. Being female or not shouldn't matter to the job. But it's an interesting footnote outside of the officious bits."
The fierce and subtle aspects of my personality were well honed in my decade here, if not born in this particular fire.
Snopes does Menken
9:42 AM
Two great things that go great together! On the urban-myth-checker site snopes.com, a Menken quote I saw recently gets confirmation:
The larger the mob, the harder the test. In small areas, before small electorates, a first-rate man occasionally fights his way through, carrying even the mob with him by force of his personality. But when the field is nationwide, and the fight must be waged chiefly at second and third hand, and the force of personality cannot so readily make itself felt, then all the odds are on the man who is, intrinsically, the most devious and mediocre — the man who can most easily adeptly disperse the notion that his mind is a virtual vacuum.
The Presidency tends, year by year, to go to such men. As democracy is perfected, the office represents, more and more closely, the inner soul of the people. We move toward a lofty ideal. On some great and glorious day the plain folks of the land will reach their heart's desire at last, and the White House will be adorned by a downright moron.
H. L. Menken, Baltimore Evening Sun on 26 July 1920
One of the interesting things about this quote is that the circulated version begins with the phrase, As democracy is perfected.... I think the whole quote is far more interesting (especially with my fascination with Howard Dean).
But then, grokking the whole quote might demand that the reader think more, and obviously Americans aren't good at that en masse.
*heh*
time travellers convention
Thursday, April 28, 2005
12:14 PM
I am currently considering making some durable art to bury in a time capsule to publicize the time travellers convention at MIT on the 7th of May. Although at least one future first hand report says it's going to be a zoo, I think both my son and I might enjoy the chaos. After all, the reporter is going back in time for his third go at it. Without a time machine, I'm afraid I'll only be able to attend once. At least, at this age.
Have I mentioned I really love the MIT sense of humor? At any rate, I used to be a resident, briefly, of East Campus in the kinder, gentler days of the MIT Non-Student Resident Association -- and of the East Campus Annex (a spin off living group in Central Square), and it sounds like a good time will be/was had by all.
Already the local SF community and SCA have been notified. It could truly be a larger event than the organizer could ever have anticipated!
What a hoot!
The blessing of the taxes
Thursday, March 24, 2005
8:45 PM
Does this count as a faith-based initiative? Today I got this in the newsletter from the Unitarian Universalist Association's UU Advocacy Office:
From April 8-17, congregations from different faith communities across the country will be taking part in a "Blessing of the Taxes" around tax day, April 15.
As Unitarian Universalists, we are committed to creating an equitable tax system that provides sufficient revenue to meet our country's human needs. Faced with a federal budget that includes massive tax cuts that largely benefit the wealthiest among us at the expense of the common good of our country, "blessing" our taxes allows us to reframe the national conversation about the role of government in society and its moral and spiritual imperatives.
What you can do: * Lay hands on envelopes containing tax returns or copies of returns in worship, and pray over them; or create an altar for tax returns * Weave the blessing into sermons or pastoral prayers * Conduct special worship services * Conduct prayer vigils at local Post Offices on April 15 (a great and easy way to get local media attention!) * Distribute the blessing with attached information about how taxes are used and how citizens can contact their legislators
The message: * Paying taxes is a moral responsibility of all people. * Creating a just tax system used for just purposes is the responsibility of all people and institutions. * Elected officials are entrusted with a greater responsibility to ensure that taxation hold as a primary concern the needs of low-income persons to prevent the entrenchment of poverty in society. * Taxation must be used toward the organization of social structures to ensure that basic human needs for all people are met. * Taxation must not inhibit a person's ability to meet their basic needs-the payment of a higher rate of taxation by those who have higher incomes or profits is just and good.
(Adapted from the Ecumenical Ministries of Oregon www.emoregon.org)
Say amen, somebody!
Martha and the end of simple things
Thursday, March 10, 2005
5:54 AM
With the frenetic media frenzy around Martha Stewart's release from prison fading into dull background noise, I've been thinking a lot about why people love and hate her. In some ways she does exemplify the comic book superhero domestic goddess, it's true, and it's hard not to see her potential as a prosperity icon for the wishful bourgoise. And, I'll confess, seeing her go to jail for lying when male CEOs from Enron and Tyco roam free is infuriating.
But here is why Martha Stewart makes me sad.
When I was a child, people in rural Vermont still made music in their kitchens, like jam (pun very much intended). In Plainfield, when I was young, you might see a boy running down the main street just yelling his fool head off: "JUNKET! Junket tonight at the Jackson house!" And word would spread.
Now, a kitchen junket is half potluck and half string band jam. You came with a dish to listen, play, noodle (learning to play by playing under the music), and generally gossip and hang out and have a good time. It wasn't scheduled. It didn't go on a bulletin at the church or post office. You just heard, and you came or you didn't.
In my youth a change came over Vermont. A lot of people blame it on transistor radios, and that might be it. I was growing up in the late 60's and 70's, and although we had little radios, the number of stations and the reception held much to be desired. But the penetration of commercial music was insidious. People starting thinking, "If I can't play like that, maybe I should be ashamed to be heard in public." *Learning* to play an instrument became something you did in private, in a room where no one heard -- not sitting on the edge of the church stage, noodling, while the contradance band played loud up behind you.
Martha Stewart is doing the same thing to the domestic arts.
Now, most professional musicians don't play so well without elaborate studio equipment and editing, but you might never know that. Radio is free (sort of -- you listen to ads or ideally contribute to nonprofit stations). CDs cost reasonable money unless you steal the music off the internet. Going to a concert is just ridiculously expensive. So a lot of folks who like music may never have heard the folks they love most live, where the blemishes might show a bit (but the energy might make up for it!).
As a result, learning an instrument -- learning music -- has become a solitary, heroic act, instead of something one just did. Like cooking, or sewing, or growing flowers, or...
Oh wait.
Martha Stewart is bleeding simplicity out of simple domestic acts, just like the glitz of the music biz bled simplicity out of local music, and movies bled community theater and vaudeville.
Now, you can look at folks like Julia Child (of blessed memory) and say, "didn't she do that?" but in fact I would say Julia was the anti-Martha (or perhaps more properly, Martha is the anti-Julia). Julia Child took the scary art of Cuisine and turned it into cooking, made it approachable, and offered you a nip of sherry to make the work seem a bit more fun.
Martha hides her staff of fourty behind her like the production crew of the ArtistPreviouslyKnownasPrince, or the three minutes of rolling credits at the end of a Lucas film.
I propose we keep these things simple. Teach people good simple ways to make food that fit their schedules. Teach people flowers they can put in a pot on their stoops, and how to use water-retaining crystals in the soil so if they forget to water them for two weeks, they won't lose them. Teach people the fastest way to cut an onion. These are the lessons we need to learn, or relearn, but more to the point we need to share them with our neighbors, our friends, and especially our children.
Take time. Use it well. Live richly on less.
looking forward
Friday, February 25, 2005
11:47 PM
Since March, I've moved at least four times. It's hard to count. My life lately has been dominated by a move back to the east coast. Part of the impetous for this move is my mother's health -- I want to be within a few hours of seeing her in her declining years. She is 85, and in failing health.
Part of the impetous was a disillusionment with west coast culture -- or my fit with it.
I have to say that since arriving in Boston perhaps a month ago, I've received more male attention than in four years in Portland, Oregon. Not that that is my primary indicator of my cultural fit, but I won't turn it down either. In the more-or-less intact circles I left fifteen years ago, a smart, articulate, geek-proud, social woman with both high business and culinary skills seems to be more of a treasure than a freak.
I think I'd forgotten how that felt, really.
Just going back to a big old white frame church with a fat rumbling pipe organ and real pews... Does my heart good. And when I pull out my knitting at church services, no one blinks, and the minister does not ask me to not bring needlework again (as happened when I moved to Eugene, Oregon).
And although I still am looking for work, I'm finding my old MIT networks are coming to bear on my problems. My son is living with his godmother in Chelmsford, and my dog is with an old dear friend in Cumberland, RI, and I am with another friend in Newton. My current goals are to find the permanent job with benefits and be in our own place (possibly with housemates) with child, dog, and self, by the start of school next fall.
Much to my amazement, my degrees of separation are very small even to new people I meet. For example, I spent the evening at a new friend's house tonight, at an every-other-Friday gaming session. I was there two weeks ago, too. The game is run by my friend Franz, who I used to game with 25 years ago. But my hostess, it turns out, is the sister of one of my dear friends in Seattle, which I just discovered last night.
All this is hardly coherent -- but it's hard for me to come up with any orderly recap of this past year, and I suspect my focus will be looking forward. It's hardly been a good year. But I hope for better times to come, if not already in the making.
That trick never works...
11:34 PM
Well, so much for last year's resolution to write more. In fact, I did write for quite a few months. I published a few articles in journals and newsletters but never sold anything, and I put a lot of attention into writing in support of the Democrats in the last election (much good I did them!).
So, in the interest of starting with a clean slate, I am going to forgive myself for having a lousy year and like Finegan, give it another go-round.
|
|
|
|
|